i failed in 2011, band 10. i passed this year.
difference in materials? in both years i relied on schweser as the main study material. however when it came to review time, i used elan’s 11 th hour review or whatever it was called. i gave it a try after reading such good reviews about it for L1. big mistake… i found myself constantly checking their site’s errata section because there were so many mistakes. i honestly thought the only section that was good was quant, where they had the flow chart for applying different methodologies and how to get around any issues.
this time around, i used schweser’s videos/powerpoint for review. i think they have 3 instructors but the main one is great, he really teaches in a way that’s easy to understand and throws in a lot of humor to keep you engaged. me personally, there were certain sections that always gave me issue no matter how many times i read the book, but the videos help you focus on what you need to know, and just that.
also in 2011, i relied on qbank for review material. that worked horribly. not only are the difficulty of questions not nearly as close as the exam, but the very fact they have such few vignettes and all random one-offs, it doesn’t translate well when it comes to preparing for the exam. qbank worked great for level 1, but for 2… not so much. this time around i used stalla’s passmaster. i found this to be much more thorough and systematic.
cliff notes: 2011 used schweser study guide (main) + elan 11th hour (final review) + qbank (practice) = band 10
2012: used same schweser guide (main) + schweser videos (final review) + passmater (practice) = PASS