S2000magician
New member
- Mar 17, 2013
- 0
- 0
Any thoughts on whether impactful is a real word?swatbsba wrote:Any thoughts on how impactful having a CFA Charter would be on a top-15 MBA application?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Any thoughts on whether impactful is a real word?swatbsba wrote:Any thoughts on how impactful having a CFA Charter would be on a top-15 MBA application?
The cost of a good full-time MBA is about $100k in tuition plus 2 years of lost salary.lxwarr30 wrote:I hope to be one of these exceptions soon. I’m surprised that more people with the CFA or progression don’t view MBA as a route to go if they’re not content…. I think it’s a good investment if you get into somewhere good.
And this is why top EMBA programs are so stinking expensive…Wendy wrote:
The cost of a good full-time MBA is about $100k in tuition plus 2 years of lost salary.lxwarr30 wrote:I hope to be one of these exceptions soon. I’m surprised that more people with the CFA or progression don’t view MBA as a route to go if they’re not content…. I think it’s a good investment if you get into somewhere good.
For the average person, this adds up to about a quarter-million dollars.
New MBA grads start at a salary of about $100k.
If you’re currently working in the military or Peace Corps etc, the investment in an MBA is totally worthwhile.
If you’re already earning $75k+, and already working in your desired industry, a full-time MBA is hard to justify. Most CFAs will fall into this camp.
Depends on the Executive MBA program in question. Some allow access to on-campus recruiting for full-time jobs; others don’t.Wendy wrote:
My objection to EMBA programs is that they lack the single most-valuable component of an MBA education, namely the recruiting opportunities.
An EMBA costs less overall – but it’s also worth much less.
Wow. That’s pretty harsh. Haven’t won any Pulitzer Prizes for my writing, but I’m assuming that you have. Kudos, friend.bchad wrote:
I believe “impactful” is a legitimate word, but only the linguistically incompetent use it.
“It’s not that the Times devalues science…It’s just a lot of what we think is good, impactful journalism gets produced in the course of a year here,” said Pulitzer Prize finalist Dennis Overbye of The New York Times.bchad wrote:I believe “impactful” is a legitimate word, but only the linguistically incompetent use it.
Solid, direct evidence in favor of bchad’s thesis.Wendy wrote:
“It’s not that the Times devalues science…It’s just a lot of what we think is good, impactful journalism gets produced in the course of a year here,” said Pulitzer Prize finalist Dennis Overbye of The New York Times.bchad wrote:I believe “impactful” is a legitimate word, but only the linguistically incompetent use it.