Z-Statistics but no sample size

A

archived_user

New member
Joined
Jun 18, 2026
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Hey everybody, I got this question here that really confuses me:
“If X has a normal distribution with μ = 100 and σ = 5, then there is approximately a 90% probability that:
A) P(91.8 < X < 108.3).
B) P(93.4 < X < 106.7).
C) P(90.2 < X < 109.8).”
It seems pretty straight forward and would be easy if I had an n there somewhere. How do I do this without a sample size? According to the solution it goes like this:
100 +/- 1.65 (5) = 91.75 to 108.25 or P ( P(91.75 < X < 108.25).
So is this the formula if I have no n? Why do I need the n then?
Thanks for the help!
 
Hi,
Have you put down the full question and answer? I’m pretty sure it’s talking about the band that 90% of the values fall into. For a 2-tailed test this is 1.65 standard deviations each side of the mean. Your standard deviation is 5, so the band is 8.25 (1.65*5) units away from the mean on each side.
 
You don’t need the sample size because this is a population problem. That’s why they use the greek letters instead of latin
μ , σ -> always population parameters
x , s -> sample parameters
 
@mattmania: yes it is possible some part of the question got lost when I copied it. But how did you get to the 8.25 in your solution? Their solution goes like this: 100 +/- 1.65 (5) = 91.75 to 108.25
@panos.kollias: ok, so in every population problem I do not need n in the formula? It just always goes: μ +/- score x σ, like in their solution above? I am confused because I thought the difference of population or sample parameters determine the test Z or T. I do not remember coming across a formula for a confidence interval that didnt have the n in it. thanks!
 
youreskimofriend wrote:
@mattmania: yes it is possible some part of the question got lost when I copied it. But how did you get to the 8.25 in your solution? Their solution goes like this: 100 +/- 1.65 (5) = 91.75 to 108.25
@panos.kollias: ok, so in every population problem I do not need n in the formula? It just always goes: μ +/- score x σ, like in their solution above? I am confused because I thought the difference of population or sample parameters determine the test Z or T. I do not remember coming across a formula for a confidence interval that didnt have the n in it. thanks!
Click to expand...
Yes! Keep in mind that population parameters are the trueparameters of the population so there is no need for approximation. We don’t need to know how big the sample was, we know what the true standard deviation and mean is.
The reason why we use n in the standard error calculation is that the greater the sample size the more accurate (close to the true population) our parameters are going to be.
 
Cpk that wasn’t the question ;)
Eskimo: your population distribution is normal. And you have the population standard dev. No standard error necessary! In real life you wouldn’t have the population data and would work off of samples. That’s why 99% of all examples and questions would require the standard error.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top